Keeping trade secrets
Written by: Halka Jaklová
Photo by: René Jakl
Do you or your firm have know-how
that you'd rather not lose? Under certain conditions trade secrecy
can be involved that is protected by the Commercial Code. What
follows from it?
According to 17, trade secrecy is all matters of a business, production,
or technical nature connected with a company, if such matters have
at least potential material or intangible value, are not commonly
accessible in relevant business circles, and should be kept secret
according to the wishes of the entrepreneur.
Protected facts can be primarily the aforementioned know-how or,
for example, knowledge of the overall state of the firm, its customers,
etc. Protection of trade secrecy can be invoked both through so-called
general protection, as stipulated in §20 of the Commercial Code,
and through protection against unfair competition as per §51-55
of the Commercial Code. The protective means are the same (for
greater detail see the article on unfair competition in our May
issue). The difference is that if unfair competition is involved
the protected facts must be usable in competition.
The following criteria must be met to receive recourse for breaching
trade secrecy in unfair competition. Information that should be
kept confidential must not be normally accessible. The offender
must learn the secret in a qualified manner, either based on employment
with the competitor, as a result of some other relationship/function
with the competitor, or through an inadmissible method or his own
or someone else's illegal actions. This can involve employees or
trainees, or persons in contracts on mandates or sales representation.
It is recommended that employment contracts contain the obligation
to keep trade secrets confidential. Persons in relationships with
the competition other than employment can include family members
or close friends.
Another criterion assumes that the offender passes a trade secret
to a third party without authorization, allows access to it, or
uses it for his own or another's benefit. Acts of either commission
or omission can evoke recourse (if the offender failed to properly
protect a trade secret), not necessarily intentionally, as negligence
suffices. The source of the secret can be an entrepreneur or a
licensing contract. But if the source is an employee who makes
use of secrets after leaving his employment, a breach of trade
secrecy is not involved (unless so stipulated by contract).
This article was prepared in cooperation with attorney-at-law
Mgr. Tomáš Krejčí.
We welcome feedback for matters of legal
advice which are particularly interesting for you. Please submit
suggestions to The Prague Tribune (Legal Labyrinths Column), Na
Maninách 7, 170 00 Praha 7, or to email@example.com.